Contrasting Views: A composite image depicting Interior Cabinet Secretary Kithure Kindiki (left) and Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua (right), who have expressed differing stances on the proposed “one man, one shilling” revenue sharing formula. IMAGE FILE | COURTESY
In Summary:
- Interior Cabinet Secretary Kithure Kindiki has strongly opposed the proposed “one man, one shilling” revenue sharing formula, labeling it unconstitutional and devoid of scientific or economic rationale.
- Kindiki argued that the approach could have severe implications for Kenya’s future and undermine the constitutional ideals and values upon which the nation is founded.
Kenya’s Interior Cabinet Secretary, Kithure Kindiki, has firmly rejected the controversial “one man, one shilling” revenue sharing formula advocated by Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and Azimio Leader Raila Odinga.
In a recent social media post, Kindiki voiced his concerns about the approach, asserting that it lacks grounding in scientific principles or established economic models.
The Cabinet Secretary contended that the “one man, one shilling” mantra is merely a casual political catchphrase born out of informal discussions, failing to account for the profound implications it could have on Kenya’s future.
He maintained that the idea would ultimately contradict the constitutional ideals and values upon which the nation is founded.
“Proponents of the man-vote-shilling mantra neither comprehend its implications for Kenya’s future nor do they grasp its long-term impact on the very regions they claim will benefit from it,” Kindiki stated, underscoring the need for a more nuanced and constitutionally sound approach.
Kindiki further emphasized that every part of Kenya is entitled to prosperity, and the country’s success is inextricably linked to the success of each of its constituent regions.
“The destiny and success of Kenya is inextricably linked to the destiny and success of each part of Kenya. One Nation, one Flag, one People,” he reiterated.
The Cabinet Secretary’s remarks followed closely after Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua defended his stance on the revenue-sharing formula, asserting his constitutional right to freedom of expression.
Gachagua questioned why he was being labeled a tribalist for voicing his opinion, citing the example of Azimio Leader Raila Odinga, who has expressed similar views without facing such accusations.
As the debate over the revenue sharing formula continues to intensify, Kindiki’s intervention underscores the need for a comprehensive and legally sound approach that upholds the constitutional principles of equity, fairness, and national unity.